8 comments

  • RALaBarge 0 minutes ago
    Hey I ran this request through my AI harness (beigeboxoss.com), first with a smaller local model and then validated with Trinity Large via OR. https://github.com/agberohq/keeper/issues/2 -- YMMV but wanted something to do with my coffee, thanks!
  • Retr0id 2 minutes ago
    Mmmm vibecrypto, my favourite. I don't see anything obviously broken (at a glance) but as a perf improvement, there's little reason to use Argon2id for the "verification hash" step, might as well use sha256 there. There is also no need to use ConstantTimeCompare because the value being compared against is not secret.
  • emanuele-em 2 minutes ago
    [delayed]
  • tietjens 4 minutes ago
    Could I use this to store secrets to hide env vars from agents?
  • modelorona 24 minutes ago
    Name could conflict with Keeper Security
  • n0n 26 minutes ago
    Genuine question: what's your thread model?

    Vault gives time limited Tokens with Network Boundary. Instead of Keeper, i would just use age:

    # write

    echo "my secret" | age -r <recipient-pubkey> > secret.age

    # read

    age -d -i key.txt secret.age

  • elthor89 53 minutes ago
    I have been looking for something like this. I know openbao, hashicorp vault.

    But they require to be placed on a separate server, and come with their own infra management.

    Is the idea of this project to embed this into you app, instead of relying on .env or an external vault?

  • nonameiguess 22 minutes ago
    Keeper is already the name of a popular enterprise secrets store: https://docs.keeper.io/en/user-guides/web-vault

    I haven't used it, don't advocate for it, and have no opinion on either its viability or your product's viability for any specific use case. Mostly I just think it's a bit confusing to have two separate products in a very similar space with the same name.