4 comments

  • thfuran 2 hours ago
    There's no way under our current economic system that the result of a tool that makes some work easier/faster would be anything other than filling the gap with more or other work.
  • QuadrupleA 1 hour ago
    One thing I haven't seen mentioned much, in AI coding and other AI-assisted work, is the sheer needless verbosity of models, the walls of text they spew out for us to read through. This alone adds to the workload & fatigue.

    There's a thing in writing, "pity the reader" - respect your audience's time, get to the point. In The Elements of Style, "omit needless words."

    You can prompt models to be succinct, but the latest ones - GPT 5-series especially - ignore your requests and spew paragraphs upon paragraphs of noise. Maybe it's the incentives of charging per token?

    If you want, I can expand on this topic and generate a lengthy comparison chart.

    • dag100 1 hour ago
      This is basically a violation of the robustness principle ("be liberal in what you accept, be conservative in what you produce"), but I doubt there will be much improvement on this front seeing as tokens are fed back into the model. A succinct phrase is a compressed form of a longer sentence that expresses the same idea, so from the perspective of having to feed the model's output back into it, more tokens presumably work better by providing a greater of surface area for processing, so to speak. This is just my intuition, however.
  • cyberclimb 1 hour ago
  • simianwords 2 hours ago
    > In fact, AI is increasing the speed, density and complexity of work rather than reducing it, according to an analysis of 164,000 workers’ digital work activity.

    Isn't this obvious? This is exactly what I would expect!

    • bluefirebrand 2 hours ago
      Yup. And because the "speed, density, complexity" is increasing, expect burnout to increase too!